Hybrid resistance cards and methods for manufacturing same

ABSTRACT

A hybrid resistance card (R-Card) is manufactured using a two-step process wherein an electrically conductive ink layer and an electrically resistive ink layer are printed onto a surface, which may be either a substrate or the part on which the R-Card is to be used. The conductive ink layer is selectively applied in a pattern of shapes to electrically short out portions of the resistive ink layer, thereby permitting the R-Card to have a predetermined resistive taper across its width according to a desired resistivity curve. The resistive ink layer comprises grid-like lines bordering and separating the conductive shapes. The resistive taper is substantially continuous along the length of the R-Card, at least linearly, though if the card is designed to cover an entire part, it is substantially continuous along a plurality of directions on the card, with the tapers being designed to round into one another. The inventive process permits much greater uniformity and predictability of result, as well as producing a much more versatile card, and is also much less expensive than currently employed processes.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

This invention relates to variable resistance cards, and moreparticularly to hybrid resistance cards (R-Cards) which are moreversatile and adaptable, yet less expensive, than existing R-Cards, andmethods for manufacturing same using a two-step printing processinvolving conductive and resistive inks.

R-Cards are a tapered resistive sheet, useful in a number of diverseapplications. As shown in the prior art FIGS. 1 and 2, in a state of theart R-Card 10, the electrical resistivity is tapered across the width ofthe sheet 12, ranging from a relatively high (approximately air)resistance to a relatively low (approximately metal) resistance,following a desired resistivity curve (see FIG. 2). This resistive taperis repeated along the entire length of the sheet 12. Currently, a numberof manufacturing processes are used to produce R-Cards. One of the mostprevalent methods is to evaporate a conductive metal onto a kaptonsubstrate. Another prevalent method involves sputtering onto a scrimmaterial. Yet another method involves spraying material onto asubstrate. However, these processes are not consistent from productionlot to lot. Additionally, only linear lengths can be manufactured usingthe evaporated or sputtering method, since it is only possible to makean end-to-end taper, rather than being able to taper the resistance inany direction. Consequently, corners cannot be made in a continuouspiece. As a result, R-Cards currently are mitered to cover curvedsurfaces, which is expensive, time consuming, and can be a source ofperformance degradation, since entire parts cannot be covered with onecard.

Additional problems plaguing current state of the art R-Cards arenumerous. Among them is that the resistivity curves that R-Cardscurrently follow are empirically manufactured at best. Current methodsdo not allow for flexibility in choosing the best substrate for theapplication. Furthermore, current production methods are very limitedwith regard to the high and low end resistances.

What is needed, therefore, are new manufacturing processes which willproduce R-Cards that can smoothly follow a curvature without mitering,enabling coverage of an entire part with a single R-Card. Also neededare methods for producing R-Cards which can follow any resistivity curveaccurately and which can be designed to start and stop at particularresistances. Most importantly, what is needed is a relatively low costproduction process which produces consistently high quality R-Cards inevery production run.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

This invention solves the problem outlined above by employing newmanufacturing processes wherein the resistive and conductive materialsforming the desired resistivity taper along the R-Card are printed ontothe card. A two step process is used wherein either both materials areapplied using a silk screening process, or, alternatively, one materialis etched and the other material is subsequently silk screened onto thecard. Furthermore, the process may be varied, producing either cardsused for treating only the edges of a part, or producing cards which cansmoothly follow a surface curvature without mitering, thereby allowingcoverage of an entire part with a single R-Card. The result of any ofthe above-described variants of the inventive process is an R-Card whichcan follow any resistivity curve and which can be designed to start andstop at particular resistances. Furthermore, the production process ismuch lower in cost than current state of the art processes and itproduces consistently high quality R-Cards in virtually every productionrun.

Elaborating on the above description, the hybrid resistance card(R-Card) which is produced has both an electrically conductive ink layerand an electrically resistive ink layer. The conductive ink layer isselectively applied in a pattern to electrically short out portions ofthe resistive ink layer, thereby permitting the R-Card to have apredetermined resistive taper across its width according to a desiredresistivity curve. The conductive ink layer is applied in a pattern ofshapes, preferably polygons, and the resistive ink layer is applied in asheet which forms a grid-like pattern of lines bordering and separatingthe conductive shapes. The resistive taper is substantially continuousalong the length of the R-Card, at least linearly, though if the card isdesigned to cover an entire part, the resistive taper is substantiallycontinuous along a plurality of directions on the card, with the tapersbeing designed to round into one another. The ink layers may be printedeither onto a substrate, such as quartz glass or S-glass, or they may beprinted directly onto the part to be covered.

An important aspect of the invention is the ability to accurately followany desired resistivity curve on a theoretical, rather than empiricalbasis, and to design the card to start and stop at predetermined desiredresistances, which are dependent upon the particular application towhich the card will be applied. Accordingly, the width of the linescomprising the resistive ink layer determines the resistivity of thecard, such that the lines are relatively thin in areas of the cardhaving relatively low resistivity and are relatively wide in areas ofthe card having relatively high resistivity. The width of the lines andsize of the conductive ink layer shapes can be calculated for anydesired resistance values using known equations, permitting themanufacture of R-Cards having extremely accurate and predictableresistance values and tapers.

In another aspect of the invention, a method of making a hybrid R-Cardlike that disclosed above is set forth, the method comprising the stepsof printing a conductive ink layer and a resistive ink layer onto asurface. The conductive ink layer is selectively applied to electricallyshort out portions of the resistive ink layer, thereby permitting thecard to have a predetermined resistive taper across its width, with thetaper being substantially continuous along the length of the R-Card, atleast in a linear direction. The steps of printing the conductive andresistive ink layers onto the surface include the steps of: a) silkscreening the conductive ink layer onto the surface, so that theconductive ink layer comprises a plurality of predetermined shapesrepeated along the length of the card; b) heat curing the conductive inklayer; c) silk screening the resistive ink layer onto the surface sothat it covers the conductive layer, forming a grid-like pattern oflines bordering and separating the predetermined shapes; and d) heatcuring the resistive ink layer. It is noted that it is equallypreferable to first silk screen the resistive ink layer onto thesurface, followed by the step of silk screening the conductive inklayer. Which layer is first silk screened onto the surface is immaterialto the function of the resultant R-Card.

In an alternative method, a metalized substrate may be employed, ontowhich the conductive layer is etched. Following this, the resistive inklayer is silk screened onto the substrate, after which it is heat cured.This method would be preferable in instances where greater resolutionwere required, though the method is slower and more costly than thetwo-step silk screening process.

The above mentioned and other objects and features of this invention andthe manner of attaining them will become apparent, and the inventionitself will be best understood, by reference to the followingdescription taken in conjunction with the accompanying illustrativedrawings.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a diagrammatic view of a prior art R-Card, showing theresistive taper, by means of shading, across the width of the card;

FIG. 2 is a perspective view of a prior art R-Card, showing theresistivity curve across the width of the card;

FIG. 3 is a plan view showing a representative portion of a hybridR-Card of the invention, with the conductive ink layer shown in whiteand the resistive ink layer shown in black; and

FIG. 4 is an enlarged detailed view of the portion of FIG. 3 designatedby reference letter A, showing in greater detail the conductive inklayer hexagons and the resistive ink layer lines spacing the conductivehexagons.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Referring now to FIG. 3, a typical hybrid R-Card 110 made by the claimedinventive method is shown. The hybrid R-Card 110 is designed to functionin the same manner as a prior art R-Card described in the Background ofthe Invention, but with greater accuracy and control over the resistivetaper. The accuracy is controlled by using a two-step process, involvingboth resistive and conductive hybrid inks which are printed on asurface, preferably a substrate material, in either a conductor over theresistor or a resistor over the conductor configuration. In thepreferred embodiment, the resistive ink has a constant value of NOhms/Square when the ink thickness is kept constant. The conductive ink,used to short out regions in the resistive ink, is applied in a patternthat is preferably made up of either 3, 4, or 6-sided polygons 114,although other shapes can be used as well, in combinations to form thenecessary repeating pattern. In FIG. 3, a typical repeating pattern isshown using polygons 114, which in this instance are hexagonal. Theconductive ink layer is shown in white, while the resistive ink layer.which comprises the lines 115 between the polygons 114, is shown inblack.

The set of polygons 114 is determined by the length of the resistivetaper needed and the desired ohmic end values. The polygons are laid outin a pattern to control the distance between each one. The size of thepolygons either grows or shrinks around a grid that depends on thehighest frequency for card operation, with the maximum size of eachpolygon 114 being one-tenth the wavelength of the operating frequency.As can be seen in FIG. 3, by observing the relative thicknesses of thelines 115 between the polygons 114, the resistivity of the cardincreases along its width from left to right, with the left side beingthe lower resistance end and the right side being the higher resistanceend.

FIG. 4 represents a detailed enlargement of the section of FIG. 3designated by the reference letter A. The hexagons 114 comprise theconductive ink layer. The desired resistance of the resistive ink layer115 can be determined by knowing the length of the polygon sides and thespacing between each polygon 114. From this the resistance can becalculated by knowing the number of squares 116 along each side that arein parallel. The size of the polygons 114 depends upon the resistancevalue desired, which in turn depends upon the number of squares needed.FIG. 4 shows how the number of squares 116 is determined. To calculatethe resistance, the following equation is employed:

    R=1/(1/R.sub.ink)N                                         (1)

where R is the resistance, R_(ink) is the resistive value of the hybridink in Ohms/Square and N is the number of squares between conductivehexagons. For instance, if R_(ink) =2000 Ohms/Square and N=4.25 squares,as shown in the FIG. 4 example, R would be calculated as follows:

    R=1/(1/2000)4.25=470.588 Ohms                              (2)

Design Process

The design process for the inventive hybrid R-Card 110 varies dependingupon whether the card is to be used to treat the edges of a part orwhether it is to be used to treat an entire part with only one card.

The design of edge treating R-Cards require the following information:length of the taper, low end resistance, high end resistance, and theequation for the desired resistivity curve. Then, using equation (1)above, the required spacing between the polygons 114 and the size ofeach polygon 114 along the taper can be calculated. The maximum size ofthe polygons 114 are determined by the highest frequency for which theR-Card 110 will be used and is at a maximum one-tenth of thatfrequency's wavelength. The smallest polygon is one half the size of thelargest. Once this information is obtained, the polygons 114 are drawnon a grid system where the polygons are centered on each grid point.After the drawing work is finished, preferably on aComputer-Aided-Design (CAD) system or the like, art work is made so thata part's conductive layer can either be silk screened or etched. Aftersilk screening or etching, the resistive ink is silk screened over theentire part. If the conductive layer is to be silk screened, then it isnot necessary for it to be the first layer of the R-Card.

The design of R-Cards 114 suitable for covering an entire part requiresthe following information: the length of the taper desired on all sides,low end resistance(s), high end resistance(s), the equation for thedesired resistivity curve for the taper to follow, and the outsidedimensions of the part. Then, using equation (1) above, the requiredspacing between the polygons 114 and the size of each polygon along thetaper can be calculated. The maximum size of the polygons 114 aredetermined by the highest frequency for which the R-Card 110 will beused and is at a maximum one-tenth of that frequency's wavelength. Thesmallest polygon is one half the size of the largest. From this data,the part design is laid out, preferably on a CAD system where tapersround into each other, instead of forming a mitered corner on a gridsystem where the polygons are centered on each grid point. After the CADwork is finished, art work is made so a part's conductive layer caneither be silk screened or etched. After silk screening or etching, theresistive ink is silk screened over the entire part. As in the case ofedge-treating cards, if the conductive layer is to be silk screened,then it is not necessary for it to be the first layer of the R-Card.

Fabrication of the R-Card

The R-Card 110 is fabricated in a two-step process that either involvestwo silk screening steps or one silk screening step and one etchingstep. The silk screening process which is employed is a known prior artprocess which is of the type used for electronic hybrid circuits andmembrane switches.

The preferred process is a two step silk screening process in which boththe conductive layer and the resistive layer is silk screened. The silkscreening process can be printed on a variety of different substrates,including kapton or polyester, or even directly on the part, without asubstrate, though in the preferred embodiment a quartz glass or S-glasssubstrate is employed. The substrate is generally of a one laminatethickness, with a polyamide resin. Any of these substrates require thatthe surfaces be clean before printing. The art work from the designprocess is then used to make a silk screen for printing the conductivelayer. Once the conductive layer is printed, it is then cured by heat.After the cure, the resistive layer is printed covering the entireconductive layer and then cured. It should be noted that it is equallypreferable to print the conductive layer over the resistive layer ratherthan the resistive layer over the conductive layer, as it makes nodifference to the function of the resulting R-Card.

Under certain circumstances, it may be preferable to employ analternative process, involving one silk screening step and one etchingstep. Such a process requires that the substrate be metalized. The firststep is the etching process, and can vary depending upon the type ofmetal on the substrate. After the etching process, the resistive layeris printed over the etched surface and then cured by heat. This etchingprocess costs more than the preferred silk screening process, but isused where greater resolution is necessary.

The primary novelty in the above disclosed processes is the use ofhybrid inks with a resistor being shorted out by conductive polygons orother entities in a manner to control the resistive taper to any givenequation. Secondarily, R-Cards 110 produced by this technique can bedesigned to wrap around corners or cover entire two or three dimensionalparts while controlling the resistive taper.

Although an exemplary embodiment of the invention has been shown anddescribed, many changes, modifications, and substitutions may be made byone having ordinary skill in the art without departing from the spiritand scope of the invention.

What is claimed is:
 1. A hybrid R-Card having a length and a width,comprising:an electrically conductive ink layer; and an electricallyresistive ink layer, wherein said conductive ink layer is selectivelyapplied in a pattern to short out portions of said resistive ink layer,such that said card has a predetermined resistive taper across its widththereof according to a desired resistivity curve, said resistive taperbeing substantially continuous along the length of the R-Card.
 2. Thehybrid R-Card as recited in claim 1, wherein said conductive ink layeris applied in a pattern of shapes and said resistive ink layer isapplied in a sheet which forms a pattern of lines bordering andseparating said shapes.
 3. The hybrid R-Card as recited in claim 2,wherein said shapes comprise polygons.
 4. The hybrid R-Card as recitedin claim 3, wherein the width of the lines comprising the resistive inklayer determines the resistivity of the card, such that the lines arethinner in areas of the card having lower resistivity and are wider inareas of the card having higher resistivity.
 5. The hybrid R-Card asrecited in claim 1, and further comprising a substrate material ontowhich said resistive ink and conductive ink layers are applied.
 6. Thehybrid R-Card as recited in claim 5, wherein said substrate materialcomprises either a quartz glass or S-glass composite.
 7. The hybridR-Card as recited in claim 1, wherein said R-Card has a plurality ofpredetermined resistive tapers which extend substantially continuouslyin a like plurality of directions on said R-Card, the tapers beingdesigned to round into one another, thereby allowing a single R-Card tocover an entire part.
 8. The hybrid R-Card as recited in claim 3,wherein the maximum size of said polygons is no larger than one-tenth ofthe wavelength of the highest frequency for which the R-Card isemployed, and the minimum size of the polygons is about one-half thesize of the largest polygons.
 9. The hybrid R-Card as recited in claim1, wherein said conductive and resistive ink layers are printed directlyonto a part which is adapted to be covered by the R-Card.
 10. The hybridR-Card as recited in claim 4, wherein said polygons comprise hexagons.11. A hybrid R-Card having a length and a width, comprising:anelectrically conductive ink layer; and an electrically resistive inklayer, wherein said conductive ink layer is selectively applied in apattern of polygons to short out portions of said resistive ink layerand said resistive ink layer is applied in a sheet which forms a patternof lines bordering and separating said polygons, such that said card hasa predetermined resistive taper across its width thereof according to adesired resistivity curve, said resistive taper being substantiallycontinuous along the length of the R-Card; wherein for saidpredetermined resistive taper, the required width of the resistive inklines separating said predetermined polygons and the size of saidpolygons at any particular location on the R-Card is calculated by thefollowing equation:

    R=1/(1/R.sub.ink)N                                         (1)

where R is the resistance, R_(ink) is the resistive value of the hybridink in Ohms/Square, and N is the number of squares between conductivepolygons.
 12. The hybrid R-Card as recited in claim 11, and furthercomprising a substrate material onto which said resistive ink andconductive ink layers are applied.
 13. The hybrid R-Card as recited inclaim 12, wherein said substrate material comprises either a quartzglass or S-glass composite.
 14. The hybrid R-Card as recited in claim11, wherein said conductive and resistive ink layers are printeddirectly onto a part which is adapted to be covered by the R-Card. 15.The hybrid R-Card as recited in claim 11, wherein said R-Card has aplurality of predetermined resistive tapers which extend substantiallycontinuously in a like plurality of directions on said R-Card, thetapers being designed to round into one another, thereby allowing asingle R-Card to cover an entire part.
 16. The hybrid R-Card as recitedin claim 11, wherein the maximum size of said polygons is equal toone-tenth of the wavelength of the highest frequency for which theR-Card is employed, and the minimum size of the polygons is equal toone-half the size of the largest polygons.
 17. The hybrid R-Card asrecited in claim 11, wherein said polygons comprise hexagons.